UNITED
STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
DC 20549
FORM
10-Q
x QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the
quarterly period ended January 1, 2011
OR
¨ TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period
from to .
Commission
File Number: 333-124824
RBC
Bearings Incorporated
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
95-4372080
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
|
|
One
Tribology Center
|
|
Oxford,
CT
|
06478
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
(203)
267-7001
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Date File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit
and post such files). Yes x No
¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See
the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large
accelerated filer þ Accelerated
filer o
Non-accelerated
filer o (Do not
check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting
company o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
As of
January 31, 2011, RBC Bearings Incorporated had 22,074,211 shares of Common
Stock outstanding.
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
Part
I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
3
|
|
|
|
ITEM
1.
|
Unaudited
Consolidated Financial Statements
|
3
|
ITEM
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of
|
|
|
Operations
|
13
|
ITEM
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
21
|
ITEM
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
22
|
|
Changes
in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
|
22
|
|
|
|
Part
II - OTHER INFORMATION
|
23
|
|
|
|
ITEM
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
23
|
ITEM
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
23
|
ITEM
6.
|
Exhibits
|
24
|
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Financial
Statements
RBC
Bearings Incorporated
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
(dollars
in thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
52,705 |
|
|
$ |
21,389 |
|
Short-term
investments
|
|
|
8,070 |
|
|
|
7,234 |
|
Accounts
receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,562
at January 1, 2011 and $1,242 at April 3, 2010
|
|
|
53,243 |
|
|
|
53,978 |
|
Inventory
|
|
|
139,588 |
|
|
|
136,366 |
|
Deferred
income taxes
|
|
|
7,982 |
|
|
|
6,249 |
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
5,936
|
|
|
|
9,287
|
|
Total
current assets
|
|
|
267,524 |
|
|
|
234,503 |
|
Property,
plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
87,953 |
|
|
|
89,537 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
34,713 |
|
|
|
34,713 |
|
Intangible
assets, net of accumulated amortization of $7,420 at January 1,
2011 and $6,354 at April 3, 2010
|
|
|
12,231 |
|
|
|
12,665 |
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
5,524
|
|
|
|
4,537
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
$ |
407,945
|
|
|
$ |
375,955
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
$ |
20,306 |
|
|
$ |
18,897 |
|
Accrued
expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
14,689 |
|
|
|
11,439 |
|
Current
portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
30,617
|
|
|
|
1,453
|
|
Total
current liabilities
|
|
|
65,612 |
|
|
|
31,789 |
|
Long-term
debt, less current portion
|
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
37,000 |
|
Deferred
income taxes
|
|
|
6,130 |
|
|
|
5,922 |
|
Other
non-current liabilities
|
|
|
16,990
|
|
|
|
17,697
|
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
|
89,482 |
|
|
|
92,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders'
equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
stock, $.01 par value; authorized shares: 10,000,000 at January 1, 2011
and April 3, 2010; none issued and outstanding
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Common
stock, $.01 par value; authorized shares: 60,000,000 at January 1, 2011
and April 3, 2010; issued and outstanding shares: 22,053,411 at January 1,
2011 and 21,902,761 shares at April 3, 2010
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
|
|
195,777 |
|
|
|
189,496 |
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive gain (loss)
|
|
|
2,399 |
|
|
|
(1,672 |
) |
Retained
earnings
|
|
|
125,528 |
|
|
|
100,527 |
|
Treasury
stock, at cost, 183,676 shares at January 1, 2011 and 170,338 shares at
April 3, 2010
|
|
|
(5,462 |
) |
|
|
(5,023 |
) |
Total
stockholders' equity
|
|
|
318,463
|
|
|
|
283,547
|
|
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
|
$ |
407,945
|
|
|
$ |
375,955
|
|
See
accompanying notes.
RBC
Bearings Incorporated
Consolidated
Statements of Operations
(dollars
in thousands, except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
sales
|
|
$ |
81,258 |
|
|
$ |
67,481 |
|
|
$ |
246,727 |
|
|
$ |
194,870 |
|
Cost
of sales
|
|
|
55,294
|
|
|
|
47,042
|
|
|
|
167,272
|
|
|
|
135,434
|
|
Gross
margin
|
|
|
25,964 |
|
|
|
20,439 |
|
|
|
79,455 |
|
|
|
59,436 |
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling,
general and administrative
|
|
|
13,328 |
|
|
|
11,936 |
|
|
|
38,808 |
|
|
|
34,687 |
|
Other,
net
|
|
|
432
|
|
|
|
364
|
|
|
|
508
|
|
|
|
1,594
|
|
Total
operating expenses
|
|
|
13,760
|
|
|
|
12,300
|
|
|
|
39,316
|
|
|
|
36,281
|
|
Operating
income
|
|
|
12,204 |
|
|
|
8,139 |
|
|
|
40,139 |
|
|
|
23,155 |
|
Interest
expense, net
|
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
394 |
|
|
|
1,165 |
|
|
|
1,323 |
|
Other
non-operating expense (income
|
|
|
456
|
|
|
|
(202 |
) |
|
|
1,273
|
|
|
|
(442 |
) |
Income
before income taxes
|
|
|
11,373 |
|
|
|
7,947 |
|
|
|
37,701 |
|
|
|
22,274 |
|
Provision
for income taxes
|
|
|
3,987
|
|
|
|
2,698
|
|
|
|
12,700
|
|
|
|
7,554
|
|
Net
income
|
|
$ |
7,386 |
|
|
$ |
5,249 |
|
|
$ |
25,001 |
|
|
$ |
14,720 |
|
Net
income per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
1.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.68 |
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
1.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.68 |
|
Weighted
average common shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
21,690,144 |
|
|
|
21,596,344 |
|
|
|
21,641,997 |
|
|
|
21,590,362 |
|
Diluted
|
|
|
22,113,754 |
|
|
|
21,768,570 |
|
|
|
22,027,525 |
|
|
|
21,735,512 |
|
See
accompanying notes.
RBC
Bearings Incorporated
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
(dollars
in thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
|
$ |
25,001 |
|
|
$ |
14,720 |
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
8,712 |
|
|
|
7,971 |
|
Excess
tax benefits from deferred compensation
|
|
|
(824 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
Deferred
income taxes
|
|
|
(1,665 |
) |
|
|
(3,847 |
) |
Amortization
of intangible assets
|
|
|
1,055 |
|
|
|
984 |
|
Amortization
of deferred financing costs
|
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
Stock-based
compensation
|
|
|
3,040 |
|
|
|
2,278 |
|
(Gain)
loss on disposition or sale of assets
|
|
|
(1,066 |
) |
|
|
29 |
|
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable
|
|
|
1,506 |
|
|
|
18,548 |
|
Inventory
|
|
|
(2,355 |
) |
|
|
(1,937 |
) |
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
3,407 |
|
|
|
3,766 |
|
Other
non-current assets
|
|
|
(453 |
) |
|
|
(1,411 |
) |
Accounts
payable
|
|
|
1,125 |
|
|
|
(4,682 |
) |
Accrued
expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
3,750 |
|
|
|
(2,318 |
) |
Other
non-current liabilities
|
|
|
(1,078 |
) |
|
|
747
|
|
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
40,375 |
|
|
|
34,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase
of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(7,252 |
) |
|
|
(7,508 |
) |
Purchase
of short-term investments
|
|
|
(1,693 |
) |
|
|
(6,263 |
) |
Acquisition
of businesses, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(1,924 |
) |
Proceeds
from sale or maturities of short-term investments
|
|
|
857 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Proceeds
from sale of assets
|
|
|
2,379
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(5,709 |
) |
|
|
(15,695 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
decrease in revolving credit facility
|
|
|
(7,000 |
) |
|
|
(15,000 |
) |
Exercise
of stock options
|
|
|
2,420 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Excess
tax benefits from stock-based compensation
|
|
|
824 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
Repurchase
of common stock
|
|
|
(439 |
) |
|
|
(788 |
) |
Financing
fees paid in connection with senior credit facility
|
|
|
(1,389 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Other,
net
|
|
|
(273 |
) |
|
|
(440 |
) |
Net
cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(5,857 |
) |
|
|
(16,192 |
) |
Effect
of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
2,507
|
|
|
|
514
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase
during the period
|
|
|
31,316 |
|
|
|
3,600 |
|
Cash,
at beginning of period
|
|
|
21,389
|
|
|
|
30,557
|
|
Cash,
at end of period
|
|
$ |
52,705
|
|
|
$ |
34,157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
disclosures of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
paid during the period for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$ |
916 |
|
|
$ |
1,168 |
|
Income
taxes
|
|
$ |
9,287 |
|
|
$ |
7,475 |
|
See
accompanying notes.
RBC
Bearings Incorporated
Notes
to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars
in thousands, except share and per share data)
The
consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by RBC
Bearings Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (collectively with its
subsidiaries, the “Company”), without audit, pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The April 3, 2010 fiscal
year end balance sheet data have been derived from the Company’s audited
financial statements, but do not include all disclosures required by generally
accepted accounting principles in the United States. The interim financial
statements included with this report have been prepared on a consistent basis
with the Company’s audited financial statements and notes thereto included in
the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 3,
2010.
These
statements reflect all adjustments, accruals and estimates consisting only of
items of a normal recurring nature, which are, in the opinion of management,
necessary for the fair presentation of the consolidated financial condition and
consolidated results of operations for the interim periods
presented. These financial statements should be read in conjunction
with the Company’s audited financial statements and notes thereto included in
the Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The
results of operations for the three and nine month periods ended January 1, 2011
are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full year. The
nine month periods ended January 1, 2011 and December 26, 2009 each include 39
weeks. The amounts shown are in thousands, unless otherwise
indicated.
Adoption
of Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU
No. 2009-13, “Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements.” This ASU establishes
the accounting and reporting guidance for arrangements including multiple
revenue-generating activities. This ASU provides amendments to the
criteria for separating deliverables, measuring and allocating arrangement
consideration to one or more units of accounting. The amendments in this ASU
also establish a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a
deliverable. Significantly enhanced disclosures are also required to provide
information about a vendor’s multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements,
including information about the nature and terms, significant deliverables, and
its performance within arrangements. The amendments also require disclosure of
the significant judgments made and changes to those judgments and how the
application of the relative selling-price method affects the timing or amount of
revenue recognition. The amendments in this ASU are effective prospectively for
revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in the fiscal years
beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early application is permitted. The Company
evaluated this new ASU and has determined that it will not have a significant
impact on the determination or reporting of its financial results.
1. Acquisition
and Disposition
On September 29, 2009, RBC Lubron
Bearing Systems, Inc. acquired certain assets of Lubron Bearing Systems, a
manufacturer of highly engineered self-lubricating bearings used in bridge
building, power generation, subsea oil production and earthquake seismic
isolation, located in Huntington Beach, California for $2,976. The purchase
price included $1,943 in cash, a $775 note payable and the assumption of certain
liabilities. The purchase price allocation is as follows: inventory ($103),
fixed assets ($829), goodwill ($1,713) and intangible assets
($331). The products associated with the acquisition are
complementary with products already provided by other Company businesses. Lubron
is included in the Plain Bearings segment. Proforma net sales and net income
inclusive of Lubron are not materially different from the amounts as reported in
the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
On June 28, 2010, RBC France SAS, a
subsidiary of Schaublin SA, sold certain assets relating to its J. Bovagnet
sales branch. The assets sold included the trade name, inventory, equipment, and
a building. Simultaneously, Schaublin SA entered into a long-term distribution
agreement for the continued distribution of Schaublin products by the J.
Bovagnet sales operation into a defined territory. A gain in the amount of $1.1
million was realized from the sale of the assets in the three month period ended
July 3, 2010.
2. Net
Income Per Common Share
Basic net
income per common share is computed by dividing net income available to common
stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares
outstanding.
Diluted
net income per common share is computed by dividing net income by the sum of the
weighted-average number of common shares and dilutive common share equivalents
then outstanding using the treasury stock method. Common share equivalents
consist of the incremental common shares issuable upon the exercise of stock
options.
The table
below reflects the calculation of weighted-average shares outstanding for each
period presented as well as the computation of basic and diluted net income per
common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
|
$ |
7,386
|
|
|
$ |
5,249
|
|
|
$ |
25,001
|
|
|
$ |
14,720
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator
for basic net income per common share—weighted-average shares
outstanding
|
|
|
21,690,144 |
|
|
|
21,596,344 |
|
|
|
21,641,997 |
|
|
|
21,590,362 |
|
Effect
of dilution due to employee stock options and unvested restricted
stock shares
|
|
|
423,610
|
|
|
|
172,226
|
|
|
|
385,528
|
|
|
|
145,150
|
|
Denominator
for diluted net income per common share — weighted-average shares
outstanding
|
|
|
22,113,754 |
|
|
|
21,768,570 |
|
|
|
22,027,525 |
|
|
|
21,735,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
net income per common share
|
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
1.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
net income per common share
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
1.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.68 |
|
Basic weighted-average common shares do
not include 107,645 and 132,225 unvested restricted stock shares at January 1,
2011 and December 26, 2009, respectively.
At January 1, 2011, 33,000 employee
stock options have been excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per
share, as the inclusion of these shares would be
anti-dilutive. 1,144,700 such options were excluded at December 26,
2009.
3. Cash
and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid
investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be
cash equivalents.
4. Short-term
Investments
Short-term investments include
corporate bonds that are classified as available-for-sale expected to be sold
within the next twelve months. These bonds, with an amortized basis
of $7,670 and $7,043 at January 1, 2011 and April 3, 2010 respectively, and with
maturity dates ranging from March 2011 to November 2016, were measured at fair
value by using quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and are
classified as Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. The impact of these
investments on results of operations and financial position was not
significant.
5. Inventory
Inventories
are stated at the lower of cost or market, using the first-in, first-out method,
and are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw
materials
|
|
$ |
12,227 |
|
|
$ |
10,392 |
|
Work
in process
|
|
|
44,301 |
|
|
|
42,622 |
|
Finished
goods
|
|
|
83,060
|
|
|
|
83,352
|
|
|
|
$ |
139,588
|
|
|
$ |
136,366
|
|
6. Intangible
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Useful
Lives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
approvals
|
|
15 |
|
|
$ |
6,116 |
|
|
$ |
1,700 |
|
|
$ |
6,083 |
|
|
$ |
1,383 |
|
Customer
relationships and lists
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
5,545 |
|
|
|
2,466 |
|
|
|
5,538 |
|
|
|
2,144 |
|
Trade
names
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
1,382 |
|
|
|
806 |
|
|
|
1,380 |
|
|
|
709 |
|
Distributor
agreements
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
722 |
|
|
|
722 |
|
|
|
722 |
|
|
|
722 |
|
Patents
and trademarks
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
4,472 |
|
|
|
812 |
|
|
|
3,884 |
|
|
|
530 |
|
Domain
names
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
437 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
437 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
Other
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
977 |
|
|
|
801 |
|
|
|
975 |
|
|
|
786 |
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
19,651
|
|
|
$ |
7,420
|
|
|
$ |
19,019
|
|
|
$ |
6,354
|
|
Amortization expense for definite-lived
intangible assets for the three and nine month periods ended January 1, 2011 was
$357 and $1,055, respectively. For the three and nine month periods ended
December 26, 2009, amortization expense was $340 and $984, respectively.
Estimated amortization expense for the remaining three months of fiscal 2011,
the four succeeding fiscal years and thereafter is as follows:
2011
|
|
$ |
355 |
|
2012
|
|
|
1,425 |
|
2013
|
|
|
1,427 |
|
2014
|
|
|
1,330 |
|
2015
|
|
|
1,329 |
|
2016
and thereafter
|
|
|
6,365 |
|
7. Comprehensive
Income
Total
comprehensive income is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
|
$ |
7,386 |
|
|
$ |
5,249 |
|
|
$ |
25,001 |
|
|
$ |
14,720 |
|
Net
prior service pension cost and actuarial losses, net of
taxes
|
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
(212 |
) |
|
|
48 |
|
Change
in fair value of derivatives, net of taxes
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
391 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
Unrealized
loss on investments, net of taxes
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
77 |
|
Foreign
currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
1,196
|
|
|
|
(831 |
) |
|
|
3,963
|
|
|
|
2,539
|
|
Total
comprehensive income
|
|
$ |
8,634 |
|
|
$ |
4,522 |
|
|
$ |
29,072 |
|
|
$ |
17,621 |
|
8. Debt
The balances payable under all
borrowing facilities are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JP
Morgan Credit Agreement, five-year senior secured revolving credit
facility; amounts outstanding bear interest at LIBOR (0.3125% at January
1, 2011), plus a specified margin
|
|
$ |
30,000 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
KeyBank
Credit Agreement, five-year senior secured revolving credit facility;
amounts outstanding bear interest at LIBOR (0.25% at April 3, 2010), plus
a specified margin
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
37,000 |
|
Note
payable
|
|
|
1,367
|
|
|
|
1,453
|
|
Total
debt
|
|
|
31,367 |
|
|
|
38,453 |
|
Less:
current portion
|
|
|
30,617
|
|
|
|
1,453
|
|
Long-term
debt
|
|
$ |
750
|
|
|
$ |
37,000
|
|
On November 30, 2010, the Company and
RBCA terminated the previous credit agreement and the related credit, security
and ancillary agreements, and entered into a new credit agreement (the “JP
Morgan Credit Agreement”) and related security and guaranty agreements with
certain banks, J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and J.P.
Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and KeyBank National Association as Co-Lead Arrangers
and Joint Lead Book Runners. The JP Morgan Credit Agreement provides RBCA, as
borrower, with a $150,000 five-year senior secured revolving credit facility
which can be increased by up to $100,000, in increments of $25,000, under
certain circumstances and subject to certain conditions (including the receipt
from one or more lenders of the additional commitment).
Amounts outstanding under the JP Morgan
Credit Agreement generally bear interest at the prime rate or LIBOR plus a
specified margin, depending on the type of borrowing being made. The applicable
margin is based upon the Company’s consolidated ratio of net debt to adjusted
EBITDA from time to time. As of January 1, 2011, the Company’s margin is 0.5%
for prime rate loans and 1.5% for LIBOR rate loans.
On November 30, 2010, the Company
borrowed approximately $30,000 under the JP Morgan Credit Agreement and used
such funds to repay the approximately $30,000 balance outstanding under the
KeyBank Credit Agreement. Amounts outstanding under the new credit agreement are
generally due and payable on the expiration date of November 30, 2015. The
Company may elect to prepay some or all of the outstanding balance from time to
time without penalty.
The JP Morgan Credit Agreement requires
the Company to comply with various covenants, including among other things,
financial covenants to maintain the following: (1) a ratio of consolidated net
debt to adjusted EBITDA not to exceed 3.25 to 1; and (2) a consolidated fixed
charge coverage ratio not to exceed 1.5 to 1. The credit agreement allows the
Company to, among other things, make distributions to shareholders, repurchase
its stock, incur other debt or liens, or acquire or dispose of assets provided
that the Company complies with certain requirements and limitations of the
agreement.
On January 8, 2008, the Company entered
into an interest rate swap agreement with a total notional value of $30,000 to
hedge a portion of its variable rate debt. Under the terms of the agreement, the
Company pays interest at a fixed rate (3.64%) and receives interest at variable
rates. The maturity date of the interest swap is June 24, 2011. The fair value
of this swap at January 1, 2011 and April 3, 2010 was a liability of $488 and
$1,131 respectively, included in other current liabilities, and was measured
using observable market inputs such as yield curves. Based on these
inputs, the swap is classified as a Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. This
instrument is designated and qualifies as a cash flow hedge. Accordingly, the
gain or loss on the hedging instrument is recognized in other comprehensive
income and reclassified into earnings contemporaneously with the earnings effect
of the hedged transaction. Earnings effect and the hedged item are
reported in interest expense.
It is the Company’s intent to pay off
the $30,000 outstanding under the revolving credit facility when the interest
rate swap agreement matures in June 2011. As a result, the $30,000 borrowing is
included in the current portion of long-term debt.
9. Income
Taxes
The
Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, and various
states and foreign jurisdictions. With few exceptions, the Company is
no longer subject to state or foreign income tax examinations by tax authorities
for years ending before March 31, 2004. A U.S. federal tax
examination by the Internal Revenue Service for the years ended March 31, 2007
and March 31, 2008 was completed during the three month period ended July 3,
2010. As a result of the audit, the Company recognized certain previously
unrecognized tax benefits of $481 in the three month period ended July 3, 2010
on the basis that the related tax positions have been effectively settled. The
Company maintains reserves for certain other unrecognized tax benefits of $2,525
related to this matter based on management’s judgment that the related tax
positions have not yet been effectively settled. Management expects such tax
positions to be settled by the end of the Company’s fiscal year ending March 31,
2012.
The
effective income tax rates for the three and nine month periods ended January 1,
2011 and December 26, 2009 were 35.1% and 33.9% and 33.7% and 33.9%,
respectively. The effective income tax rate for the nine month period ended
January 1, 2011 of 33.7% includes the reversal of unrecognized tax
benefits of $481 associated with the conclusion of the Company’s IRS
audit. The effective income tax rate for the nine month period ended
January 1, 2011 without this discrete item would have been 35.2%. The
effective income tax rates for the three and nine month periods ended January 1,
2011 are different from the U.S. statutory rate due to a special manufacturing
deduction in the U.S., which decreases the rates, and state income taxes which
increase the rates. In addition to the above, the effective tax rates
for the three and nine month periods ended December 26, 2009 are different from
the U.S. statutory rate due to a tax holiday relating to the Schaublin facility
in Switzerland, which decreases the rates. This holiday expired in
March 2010.
10. Segment
Information
The Company has three reportable
business segments engaged in the manufacture and sale of the
following:
Roller
Bearings. Roller bearings are anti-friction bearings that use
rollers instead of balls. The Company manufactures four basic types of roller
bearings: heavy duty needle roller bearings with inner rings, tapered roller
bearings, track rollers and aircraft roller bearings.
Plain
Bearings. Plain bearings are produced with either
self-lubricating or metal-to-metal designs and consists of several sub-classes,
including rod end bearings, spherical plain bearings and journal bearings.
Unlike ball bearings, which are used in high-speed rotational applications,
plain bearings are primarily used to rectify inevitable misalignments in various
mechanical components.
Ball
Bearings. The Company manufactures four basic types of ball
bearings: high precision aerospace, airframe control, thin section and
commercial ball bearings which are used in high-speed rotational
applications.
Certain other operating segments do not
meet the quantitative thresholds for separate disclosure and their information
is combined and disclosed as "Other".
Other. Other
consists of three minor operating locations that do not fall into the above
segmented categories. The Company’s precision machine tool collets provide
effective part holding and accurate part location during machining operations.
Additionally, the Company provides machining for integrated bearing assemblies
and aircraft components for the commercial and defense aerospace markets and
tight-tolerance, precision mechanical components for use in the motion control
industry.
Segment
performance is evaluated based on segment net sales and operating income. Items
not allocated to segment operating income include corporate administrative
expenses and certain other amounts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
External Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Roller
|
|
$ |
24,988 |
|
|
$ |
18,955 |
|
|
$ |
73,280 |
|
|
$ |
51,834 |
|
Plain
|
|
|
39,919 |
|
|
|
32,717 |
|
|
|
123,515 |
|
|
|
93,979 |
|
Ball
|
|
|
9,561 |
|
|
|
10,112 |
|
|
|
30,537 |
|
|
|
33,724 |
|
Other
|
|
|
6,790 |
|
|
|
5,697 |
|
|
|
19,395 |
|
|
|
15,333 |
|
|
|
$ |
81,258 |
|
|
$ |
67,481 |
|
|
$ |
246,727 |
|
|
$ |
194,870 |
|
Operating
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Roller
|
|
$ |
6,996 |
|
|
$ |
4,946 |
|
|
$ |
20,371 |
|
|
$ |
14,779 |
|
Plain
|
|
|
9,929 |
|
|
|
7,083 |
|
|
|
33,630 |
|
|
|
18,845 |
|
Ball
|
|
|
838 |
|
|
|
1,127 |
|
|
|
2,268 |
|
|
|
4,633 |
|
Other
|
|
|
1,367 |
|
|
|
646 |
|
|
|
4,309 |
|
|
|
761 |
|
Corporate
|
|
|
(6,926 |
) |
|
|
(5,663 |
) |
|
|
(20,439 |
) |
|
|
(15,863 |
) |
|
|
$ |
12,204 |
|
|
$ |
8,139 |
|
|
$ |
40,139 |
|
|
$ |
23,155 |
|
Geographic
External Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
$ |
69,852 |
|
|
$ |
56,643 |
|
|
$ |
214,363 |
|
|
$ |
164,895 |
|
Foreign
|
|
|
11,406 |
|
|
|
10,838 |
|
|
|
32,364 |
|
|
|
29,975 |
|
|
|
$ |
81,258 |
|
|
$ |
67,481 |
|
|
$ |
246,727 |
|
|
$ |
194,870 |
|
Intersegment
Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Roller
|
|
$ |
3,099 |
|
|
$ |
1,894 |
|
|
$ |
8,589 |
|
|
$ |
6,255 |
|
Plain
|
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
1,308 |
|
|
|
1,131 |
|
Ball
|
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
768 |
|
|
|
958 |
|
|
|
3,471 |
|
Other
|
|
|
4,158 |
|
|
|
3,657 |
|
|
|
13,595 |
|
|
|
11,229 |
|
|
|
$ |
8,011 |
|
|
$ |
6,750 |
|
|
$ |
24,450 |
|
|
$ |
22,086 |
|
All
intersegment sales are eliminated in consolidation.
11. Pension
and Postretirement Plans
The
Company has one consolidated noncontributory defined benefit pension plan
covering union employees in its Heim division plant in Fairfield, Connecticut
and its Bremen subsidiary plant in Plymouth, Indiana and former union employees
of the Tyson subsidiary in Glasgow, Kentucky and the Nice subsidiary in
Kulpsville, Pennsylvania.
The
following table illustrates the components of net periodic benefit cost for the
Company’s pension benefits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components
of net periodic benefit cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service
cost
|
|
$ |
84 |
|
|
$ |
82 |
|
|
$ |
252 |
|
|
$ |
246 |
|
Interest
cost
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
321 |
|
|
|
909 |
|
|
|
961 |
|
Expected
return on plan assets
|
|
|
(381 |
) |
|
|
(393 |
) |
|
|
(1,143 |
) |
|
|
(1,180 |
) |
Amortization
of prior service cost
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
Amortization
of losses
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Total
net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$ |
122 |
|
|
$ |
24 |
|
|
$ |
366 |
|
|
$ |
73 |
|
The
Company made a voluntary contribution of $500 to the pension plan in the nine
month period ended January 1, 2011. The Company made no contributions to the
pension plan in the nine month period ended December 26, 2009.
The
Company, for the benefit of employees at its Heim, West Trenton and PIC Design
facilities and former union employees of its Tyson, Bremen and Nice
subsidiaries, sponsors contributory defined benefit health care plans that
provide postretirement medical and life insurance benefits to union employees
who have attained certain age and/or service requirements while employed by the
Company.
The
following table illustrates the components of net periodic benefit cost for the
Company’s other postretirement benefits:
|
|
Other Postretirement Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components
of net periodic benefit cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service
cost
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
$ |
33 |
|
Interest
cost
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
Prior
service cost amortization
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
Amount
of loss recognized
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Total
net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$ |
48 |
|
|
$ |
71 |
|
|
$ |
143 |
|
|
$ |
210 |
|
One of the Company’s foreign
operations, Schaublin, sponsors a pension plan for its approximately 132
employees in conformance with Swiss pension law. The plan is funded
with a reputable (S&P rating AA-) Swiss insurer. Through the
insurance contract, the Company has effectively transferred all investment and
mortality risk to the insurance company, which guarantees the federally mandated
annual rate of return and the conversion rate at retirement. As a
result, the plan has no unfunded liability; the interest cost is exactly offset
by actual return. Thus, the net periodic cost is equal to the amount
of annual premium paid by the Company. For the three and nine month
periods ended January 1, 2011, the Company made contribution and premium
payments equal to $176 and $443, respectively. For the three and nine
month periods ended December 26, 2009, the contribution and
premium payments equaled $161 and $484, respectively.
ITEM
2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations
Cautionary
Statement As To Forward-Looking Information
The
information in this discussion contains “forward-looking statements” within the
meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 which are subject to the “safe harbor” created
by those sections. All statements other than statements of historical facts,
included in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q regarding our strategy, future
operations, future financial position, future revenues, projected costs,
prospects and plans and objectives of management are “forward-looking
statements” as the term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995.
The
words “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,”
“plans,” “projects,” “will,” “would” and similar expressions are intended to
identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements
contain these identifying words. We may not actually achieve the
plans, intentions or expectations disclosed in our forward-looking statements
and you should not place undue reliance on our forward-looking
statements. Actual results or events could differ materially from the
plans, intentions and expectations disclosed in the forward-looking statements
that we make. These forward-looking statements involve risks and
uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from
those in the forward-looking statements, including, without
limitation: (a) the bearing industry is highly competitive, and this
competition could reduce our profitability or limit our ability to grow; (b) the
loss of a major customer could result in a material reduction in our revenues
and profitability; (c) weakness in any of the industries in which our customers
operate, as well as the cyclical nature of our customers’ businesses generally,
could materially reduce our revenues and profitability; (d) future reductions or
changes in U.S. government spending could negatively affect our business; (e)
fluctuating supply and costs of raw materials and energy resources could
materially reduce our revenues, cash flow from operations and profitability; (f)
our products are subject to certain approvals, and the loss of such approvals
could materially reduce our revenues and profitability; (g) restrictions in our
indebtedness agreements could limit our growth and our ability to respond to
changing conditions; (h) work stoppages and other labor problems could
materially reduce our ability to operate our business; (i) our business is
capital intensive and may consume cash in excess of cash flow from our
operations; (j) unexpected equipment failures, catastrophic events or capacity
constraints may increase our costs and reduce our sales due to production
curtailments or shutdowns; (k) we may not be able to continue to make the
acquisitions necessary for us to realize our growth strategy; (l) the costs and
difficulties of integrating acquired businesses could impede our future growth;
(m) we depend heavily on our senior management and other key personnel, the loss
of whom could materially affect our financial performance and prospects; (n) our
international operations are subject to risks inherent in such activities; (o)
currency translation risks may have a material impact on our results of
operations; (p) we may be required to make significant future contributions to
our pension plan; (q) we may incur material losses for product liability and
recall related claims; (r) environmental regulations impose substantial costs
and limitations on our operations, and environmental compliance may be more
costly than we expect; (s) our intellectual property and other proprietary
rights are valuable, and any inability to protect them could adversely affect
our business and results of operations; in addition, we may be subject to
infringement claims by third parties; (t) cancellation of orders in our backlog
of orders could negatively impact our revenues; (u) if we fail to maintain an
effective system of internal controls, we may not be able to accurately report
our financial results or prevent fraud; and (v) provisions in our charter
documents may prevent or hinder efforts to acquire a controlling interest in us.
Additional information regarding these and other risks and uncertainties is
contained in our periodic filings with the SEC, including, without limitation,
the risks identified under the heading “Risk Factors” set forth in the Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 3, 2010. Our
forward-looking statements do not reflect the potential impact of any future
acquisitions, mergers, dispositions, joint ventures or investments we may make.
We do not intend, and undertake no obligation, to update or alter any
forward-looking statement. The following section is qualified in its
entirety by the more detailed information, including our financial statements
and the notes thereto, which appears elsewhere in this Quarterly
Report.
Overview
We are an international manufacturer
and marketer of highly engineered precision plain, roller and ball bearings.
Bearings, which are integral to the manufacture and operation of most machines
and mechanical systems, reduce wear to moving parts, facilitate proper power
transmission and reduce damage and energy loss caused by friction. While we
manufacture products in all major bearing categories, we focus primarily on
highly technical or regulated bearing products for specialized markets that
require sophisticated design, testing and manufacturing capabilities. We believe
our unique expertise has enabled us to garner leading positions in many of the
product markets in which we primarily compete. We have been providing bearing
solutions to our customers since 1919. Over the past ten years, we have
significantly broadened our end markets, products, customer base and geographic
reach. We currently have 25 facilities, of which 23 are manufacturing
facilities, in four countries.
Demand
for bearings generally follows the market for products in which bearings are
incorporated and the economy as a whole. Purchasers of bearings include
industrial equipment and machinery manufacturers, producers of commercial and
military aerospace equipment such as missiles and radar systems, agricultural
machinery manufacturers, construction and specialized equipment manufacturers
and automotive and commercial truck manufacturers. The markets for our products
are cyclical, and general market conditions could negatively impact our
operating results. We have endeavored to mitigate the cyclicality of our product
markets by entering into sole-source relationships and long-term purchase
orders, through diversification across multiple market segments within the
aerospace and defense and diversified industrial segments, by increasing sales
to the aftermarket and by focusing on developing highly customized
solutions.
Outlook
Backlog, as of January 1, 2011, was
$180.0 million versus $155.6 million as of December 26, 2009. Management
believes that operating cash flows and available credit under the credit
facility will provide adequate resources to fund internal and external growth
initiatives for the foreseeable future.
Results
of Operations
The following table sets forth the
various components of our consolidated statements of operations, expressed as a
percentage of net sales, for the periods indicated that are used in connection
with the discussion herein.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement
of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
sales
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Gross
margin
|
|
|
32.0 |
|
|
|
30.3 |
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
|
30.5 |
|
Selling,
general and administrative
|
|
|
16.4 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
15.7 |
|
|
|
17.8 |
|
Other,
net
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
Operating
income
|
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
16.3 |
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
Interest
expense, net
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
Other
non-operating expense (income)
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
Income
before income taxes
|
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
Provision
for income taxes
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
Net
income
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
Three
Month Period Ended January 1, 2011 Compared to Three Month Period Ended December
26, 2009
Net Sales. Net
sales for the three month period ended January 1, 2011 were $81.3 million, an
increase of $13.8 million, or 20.4%, compared to $67.5 million for the
same period in the prior fiscal year. During the three month period ended
January 1, 2011, we experienced a net sales increase in two of our three
reportable segments, driven by the current economic recovery across our end
markets in the diversified industrial sector. Net sales to diversified
industrial customers grew 44.0% in the three month period ended January 1, 2011
compared to the same period last fiscal year. This is mainly the
result of strong orders in construction and mining, semiconductor, military
vehicles and the general industrial markets. Net sales to aerospace
and defense customers increased 2.6% in the three month period ended January 1,
2011 compared to the same period last fiscal year.
The Plain
Bearings segment achieved net sales of $39.9 million for the three month
period ended January 1, 2011, an increase of $7.2 million, or 22.0%, compared to
$32.7 million for the same period in the prior fiscal year. Net sales to
diversified industrial customers increased $4.6 million in this market sector,
combined with an increase in net sales to aerospace and defense customers of
$2.6 million compared with the prior fiscal year. The improvement in
the diversified industrial market was attributable to demand for military
vehicles combined with overall demand in the construction and mining and general
industrial markets.
The
Roller Bearings segment achieved net sales of $25.0 million for the three
month period ended January 1, 2011, an increase of $6.0 million, or 31.8%,
compared to $19.0 million for the same period in the prior fiscal year. Of
this increase, net sales to the industrial sector contributed $5.4 million
combined with a slight increase of $0.6 million in net sales to aerospace and
defense customers. This increased net sales in the industrial sector
was primarily attributable to improved order activity in the construction and
mining and general industrial markets.
The Ball
Bearings segment achieved net sales of $9.6 million for the three month period
ended January 1, 2011, a decrease of $0.5 million, or 5.4%, compared to
$10.1 million for the same period in the prior fiscal year. Net sales to
the aerospace and defense sector contributed $2.0 million to this decline which
was offset by an increase of $1.5 million in the diversified industrial
sector. Aerospace and defense was negatively impacted by continued
slowness in the business jet market and the general aerospace aftermarket which
was offset by stronger order activity from the general industrial
markets.
The Other
segment, which is focused mainly on the sale of machine tool collets and
precision mechanical components, achieved net sales of $6.8 million for the
three month period ended January 1, 2011, an increase of $1.1 million, or 19.2%,
compared to $5.7 million for the same period last fiscal year.
Gross
Margin. Gross margin was $26.0 million, or 32.0% of net
sales, for the three month period ended January 1, 2011, versus
$20.4 million, or 30.3% of net sales, for the comparable period in fiscal
2010. The increase in our gross margin as a percentage of net sales was
primarily the result of improvement in overall volume offset by costs of $0.6
million associated with new large bearing product lines.
Selling, General and
Administrative. SG&A expenses increased by
$1.4 million, or 11.7%, to $13.3 million for the three month period
ended January 1, 2011 compared to $11.9 million for the same period in
fiscal 2010. As a percentage of net sales, SG&A decreased to 16.4% for the
three month period ended January 1, 2011 compared to 17.7% for the three month
period ended December 26, 2009. The increase of $1.4 million was primarily
attributable to personnel-related cost increases, higher incentive stock
compensation expense of $0.2 million, and an increase in professional
fees.
Other, net. Other,
net for the three month periods ended January 1, 2011 and December 26, 2009,
respectively, was expense of $0.4 million. For the three month period
ended January 1, 2011, other, net consisted of $0.3 million of amortization of
intangibles and $0.1 million of restructuring costs. For the three month period
ended December 26, 2009, other, net consisted of $0.3 million of amortization of
intangibles and $0.1 million of restructuring and moving costs, including
severance costs and the consolidation of our Houston, Texas
facilities.
Operating Income. The
increase in operating income in two of our three reportable segments was driven
primarily by the current recovery in our industrial business.
Operating
income was $12.2 million, or 15.0% of net sales, for the three month period
ended January 1, 2011 compared to $8.1 million, or 12.1% of net sales, for the
three month period ended December 26, 2009. Operating income for the Plain
Bearings segment was $9.9 million for the three month period ended January 1,
2011, or 24.9% of net sales, compared to $7.1 million for the same period
last year, or 21.6% of net sales. Our Roller Bearings segment achieved an
operating income for the three month period ended January 1, 2011 of
$7.0 million, or 28.0% of net sales, compared to $4.9 million, or
26.1% of net sales, for the three month period ended December 26,
2009. Our Ball Bearings segment reported operating income of
$0.8 million, or 8.8% of net sales, for the three month period ended
January 1, 2011, compared to $1.1 million, or 11.1% of net sales, for the
same period in fiscal 2010. Our Other segment achieved an operating income of
$1.4 million, or 20.1% of net sales, for the three month period ended
January 1, 2011, compared to $0.6 million, or 11.3% of net sales, for the
same period in fiscal 2010.
Interest Expense,
net. Interest expense, net remained flat at $0.4 million in
the three month periods ended January 1, 2011 and December 26, 2009,
respectively.
Other Non-Operating
Expense. We received approximately $0.2 million in the three
month periods ended January 1, 2011 and December 26, 2009, respectively, in
payments under the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act (CDSOA) which
distributes antidumping duties paid by overseas companies to domestic firms hurt
by unfair trade. We also incurred losses of $0.7 million for the three month
period ended January 1, 2011, mainly the result of foreign exchange
activity.
Income Before Income
Taxes. Income before taxes increased by $3.5 million, to
$11.4 million for the three month period ended January 1, 2011 compared to
$7.9 million for the three month period ended December 26,
2009.
Income
Taxes. Income tax expense for the three month period ended
January 1, 2011 was $4.0 million compared to $2.7 million for the
three month period ended December 26, 2009. Our effective income tax rate for
the three month period ended January 1, 2011 was 35.1% compared to 33.9% for the
three month period ended December 26, 2009. The effective income tax
rate for the three month period ended January 1, 2011 is different from the U.S.
statutory rate due to a special manufacturing deduction in the U.S., which
decreases the rate, and state income taxes which increase the
rate. In addition to the above, the effective tax rate for the three
month period ended December 26, 2009 is different from the U.S. statutory rate
due to a tax holiday relating to the Schaublin facility in Switzerland, which
decreases the rate. This holiday expired in March 2010.
Net Income. Net
income increased by $2.2 million to $7.4 million for the three month period
ended January 1, 2011 compared to $5.2 million for the three month period
ended December 26, 2009.
Nine
Month Period Ended January 1, 2011 Compared to Nine Month Period Ended December
26, 2009
Net Sales. Net
sales for the nine month period ended January 1, 2011 were $246.7 million, an
increase of $51.8 million, or 26.6%, compared to $194.9 million for
the same period in the prior fiscal year. During the nine month period ended
January 1, 2011, we experienced a net sales increase in two of our three
reportable business segments, driven by the current economic recovery across our
end markets in the diversified industrial sector. Net sales to diversified
industrial customers grew 72.8% in the nine month period ended January 1, 2011
compared to the same period last fiscal year. This is mainly the
result of strong orders in construction and mining, semiconductor, military
vehicles and the general industrial markets. The inclusion of our
Lubron acquisition contributed $2.3 million to the increased net sales to
diversified industrial customers. Net sales to aerospace and defense
customers declined 2.8% in the nine month period ended January 1, 2011 compared
to the same period last fiscal year, mainly driven by a continued slowness in
the business jet market and in the general aerospace aftermarket.
The Plain
Bearings segment achieved net sales of $123.5 million for the nine month
period ended January 1, 2011, an increase of $29.5 million, or 31.4%, compared
to $94.0 million for the same period in the prior fiscal
year. Net sales to diversified industrial customers increased
$23.3 million combined with a $3.9 million increase in net sales to aerospace
and defense customers compared with the same period in the prior fiscal
year. This segment was favorably impacted by stronger demand for
military vehicles combined with continued improvement in construction and mining
and the general industrial markets. In addition, the inclusion of our
Lubron acquisition contributed $2.3 million to the increase in net sales to
diversified industrial customers.
The
Roller Bearings segment achieved net sales of $73.3 million for the nine
month period ended January 1, 2011, an increase of $21.5 million, or 41.4%,
compared to $51.8 million for the same period in the prior fiscal
year. Of this increase, net sales to the industrial sector
contributed $18.9 million combined with an increase of $2.6 million in net sales
to aerospace and defense customers. This performance was favorably
impacted by growth in the construction and mining markets, as well as increased
activities by general industrial distributors.
The Ball
Bearings segment achieved net sales of $30.5 million for the nine month period
ended January 1, 2011, a decrease of $3.2 million, or 9.5%, compared to
$33.7 million for the same period in the prior fiscal year. Net
sales to the aerospace and defense sector contributed $9.4 million to this
decline which was offset by an increase of $6.2 million in the diversified
industrial sector. Aerospace and defense was negatively impacted by
continued slowness in the business jet market and the general aerospace
aftermarket offset by increased order activity from the general industrial
markets.
The Other
segment, which is focused mainly on the sale of machine tool collets and
precision mechanical components, achieved net sales of $19.4 million for
the nine month period ended January 1, 2011, an increase of $4.1 million, or
26.5%, compared to $15.3 million for the same period last fiscal
year.
Gross
Margin. Gross margin was $79.5 million, or 32.2% of net
sales, for the nine month period ended January 1, 2011, versus
$59.4 million, or 30.5% of net sales, for the comparable period in fiscal
2010. The increase in our gross margin as a percentage of net sales was
primarily the result of improvement in overall volume offset by costs of $2.1
million associated with new large bearing product lines.
Selling, General and
Administrative. SG&A expenses increased by
$4.1 million, or 11.9%, to $38.8 million for the nine month period
ended January 1, 2011 compared to $34.7 million for the same period in
fiscal 2010. As a percentage of net sales, SG&A decreased to 15.7% for the
nine month period ended January 1, 2011 compared to 17.8% for the comparable
period last fiscal year. The increase of $4.1 million was primarily attributable
to personnel-related cost increases, higher incentive stock compensation expense
of $0.8 million, and an increase in professional fees.
Other, net. Other,
net for the nine month period ended January 1, 2011 decreased by $1.1 million,
to $0.5 million compared to $1.6 million for the comparable
period in fiscal 2010. For the nine month period ended January 1, 2011, other,
net consisted of a net gain of $1.1 million on the sale of assets offset by $1.0
million of amortization of intangibles, $0.4 million of bad debt expense and
$0.2 million of restructuring costs. For the nine month period ended December
26, 2009, other, net consisted of $1.0 million of amortization of intangibles
and $0.7 million of restructuring and moving costs offset by miscellaneous
income of $0.1 million.
Operating Income. The
increase in operating income in two of our three reportable segments was driven
primarily by the current recovery in our industrial business.
Operating
income was $40.1 million, or 16.3% of net sales, for the nine month period
ended January 1, 2011 compared to $23.2 million, or 11.9% of net sales, for
the nine month period ended December 26, 2009. Operating income for the Plain
Bearings segment was $33.6 million for the nine month period ended January 1,
2011, or 27.2% of net sales, compared to $18.8 million for the same period
last year, or 20.1% of net sales. Our Roller Bearings segment achieved an
operating income for the nine month period ended January 1, 2011 of
$20.4 million, or 27.8% of net sales, compared to $14.8 million, or
28.5% of net sales, for the nine month period ended December 26,
2009. Our Ball Bearings segment achieved an operating income of
$2.3 million, or 7.4% of net sales, for the nine month period ended January
1, 2011, compared to $4.6 million, or 13.7% of net sales, for the same
period in fiscal 2010. Our Other segment achieved an operating income of
$4.3 million, or 22.2% of net sales, for the nine month period ended
January 1, 2011, compared to $0.8 million, or 5.0% of net sales, for the
same period in fiscal 2010.
Interest Expense,
net. Interest expense, net decreased by $0.1 million to $1.2
million in the nine month period ended January 1, 2011, compared to $1.3 million
in the same period last fiscal year, mainly driven by a combination of lower
interest rates and debt.
Other Non-Operating Expense
(Income). We received approximately $0.2 million in the nine month
periods ended January 1, 2011 and December 26, 2009, respectively, in payments
under the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act (CDSOA) which distributes
antidumping duties paid by overseas companies to domestic firms hurt by unfair
trade. We also incurred losses of $1.5 million for the nine month period ended
January 1, 2011 compared to gains of $0.2 million for the nine month period
ended December 26, 2009, mainly the result of foreign exchange
activity.
Income Before Income
Taxes. Income before taxes increased by $15.4 million, to
$37.7 million for the nine month period ended January 1, 2011 compared to
$22.3 million for the nine month period ended December 26,
2009.
Income
Taxes. Income tax expense for the nine month period ended
January 1, 2011 was $12.7 million compared to $7.6 million for the
nine month period ended December 26, 2009. Our effective income tax rate for the
nine month period ended January 1, 2011 was 33.7% compared to 33.9% for the nine
month period ended December 26, 2009. The effective income tax rate
for the nine month period ended January 1, 2011 of 33.7% includes the reversal
of unrecognized tax benefits of $0.5 million associated with the conclusion of
the Company’s IRS audit. The effective income tax rate for the nine
month period ended January 1, 2011 without this discrete item would have been
35.2%. The effective income tax rate for the nine month period ended January 1,
2011 is different from the U.S. statutory rate due to a special manufacturing
deduction in the U.S., which decreases the rate, and state income taxes which
increase the rate. In addition to the above, the effective tax rate
for the nine month period ended December 26, 2009 is different from the U.S.
statutory rate due to a tax holiday relating to the Schaublin facility in
Switzerland, which decreases the rate. This holiday expired in March
2010.
Net Income. Net
income increased by $10.3 million to $25.0 million for the nine month
period ended January 1, 2011 compared to $14.7 million for the nine month
period ended December 26, 2009.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Liquidity
On November 30, 2010, we terminated our
previous credit agreement and the related credit, security and ancillary
agreements, and entered into a new credit agreement (the “JP Morgan Credit
Agreement”) and related security and guaranty agreements with certain banks,
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and J.P. Morgan Chase
Bank, N.A. and KeyBank National Association as Co-Lead Arrangers and Joint Lead
Book Runners. The JP Morgan Credit Agreement provides us, as borrower, with a
$150.0 million five-year senior secured revolving credit facility which can be
increased by up to $100.0 million, in increments of $25.0 million, under certain
circumstances and subject to certain conditions (including the receipt from one
or more lenders of the additional commitment).
On November 30, 2010, we borrowed
approximately $30.0 million under the JP Morgan Credit Agreement and used such
funds to repay the approximately $30.0 million balance outstanding under the
former KeyBank Credit Agreement.
Amounts
outstanding under the JP Morgan Credit Agreement generally bear interest at the
prime rate, or LIBOR plus a specified margin, depending on the type of borrowing
being made. The applicable margin is based on our consolidated ratio of net debt
to adjusted EBITDA from time to time. Currently, our margin is 0.5% for prime
rate loans and 1.5% for LIBOR rate loans. We may elect to prepay some or all of
the outstanding balance from time to time without penalty.
Amounts outstanding under the JP Morgan
Credit Agreement are due and payable on its expiration date (November 30, 2015).
However, it is the Company’s intent to pay off the $30.0 million outstanding
under the revolving credit facility when the interest rate swap agreement
matures in June 2011. As a result, the $30.0 million borrowing is included in
the current portion of long-term debt.
The JP Morgan Credit Agreement allows
us to, among other things, make distributions to shareholders, repurchase our
stock, incur other debt or liens, or acquire or dispose of assets provided that
we comply with certain requirements and limitations of the credit agreement. Our
obligations under the JP Morgan Credit Agreement are secured by a pledge of
substantially all of our and RBCA’s assets and a guaranty by us of RBCA’s
obligations. As of January 1, 2011, $30.0 million was outstanding
under the JP Morgan Credit Agreement. Approximately $6.0 million of
the JP Morgan Credit Agreement is being utilized to provide letters of credit to
secure our obligations relating to certain insurance programs. As of January 1,
2011, we had the ability to borrow up to an additional $114.0 million under the
JP Morgan Credit Agreement.
On October 27, 2008, Schaublin S.A.
entered into a new bank credit facility with Credit Suisse (the “Swiss Credit
Facility”) which provides for up to 4.0 million Swiss francs, or $4.2 million,
of revolving credit loans and letters of credit. Borrowings under the
Swiss Credit Facility bear interest at Credit Suisse’s prevailing prime bank
rate. As of January 1, 2011, there were no borrowings under the Swiss
Credit Facility.
On June 15, 2007, our board of
directors authorized us to repurchase up to $10.0 million of our common stock
from time to time on the open market, through block trades, or in privately
negotiated transactions depending on market conditions, alternative uses of
capital and other factors. Purchases may be commenced, suspended or
discontinued at any time without prior notice. For the nine months
ended January 1, 2011, 13,338 shares have been repurchased at a cost of $0.4
million. As of January 1, 2011, 146,320 shares have been repurchased under this
plan for an aggregate cost of $4.4 million.
Our ability to meet future working
capital, capital expenditures and debt service requirements will depend on our
future financial performance, which will be affected by a range of economic,
competitive and business factors, particularly interest rates, cyclical changes
in our end markets and prices for steel and our ability to pass through price
increases on a timely basis, many of which are outside of our
control. In addition, future acquisitions could have a significant
impact on our liquidity position and our need for additional funds.
From time to time we evaluate our
existing facilities and operations and their strategic importance to us. If we
determine that a given facility or operation does not have future strategic
importance, we may sell, partially or completely, relocate production lines,
consolidate or otherwise dispose of those operations. Although we believe our
operations would not be materially impaired by such dispositions, relocations or
consolidations, we could incur significant cash or non-cash charges in
connection with them.
Cash
Flows
Nine
Month Period Ended January 1, 2011 Compared to the Nine Month Period Ended
December 26, 2009
In the nine month period ended January
1, 2011, we generated cash of $40.4 million from operating activities
compared to $35.0 million for the nine month period ended December 26,
2009. The increase of $5.4 million was mainly a result of an increase in
net income of $10.3 million and an increase in non-cash charges of $1.9 million
offset by an increase in net operating assets and liabilities of $6.8
million.
Cash used
for investing activities for the nine month period ended January 1, 2011
included $7.3 million related to capital expenditures and $0.8 million, net, for
the purchase of short-term investments. This was offset by $2.4
million of proceeds from the sale of certain assets of our J. Bovagnet sales
brand. In the nine month period ended December 26, 2009, investing activities
included $7.5 million of capital expenditures, $3.8 million of which was
associated with the building of a new wind bearing facility in Texas, $6.3
million for the purchase of short-term investments and $1.9 million related to
the acquisition of Lubron.
Financing
activities used $5.9 million in the nine month period ended January 1, 2011
compared to $16.2 million for the nine month period ended December 26, 2009,
primarily for debt reduction. The nine month period ended January 1, 2011
included the $37.0 million repayment on our prior credit facility, $1.4 million
in financing fees in connection with our new credit facility, $0.4 million for
the repurchase of common stock and $0.3 million in other miscellaneous payments.
This was offset by $30.0 million borrowing on our new credit facility, $2.4
million from the exercise of stock options and $0.8 million in excess tax
benefits from stock-based compensation.
Capital
Expenditures
Our capital expenditures were $7.3
million for the nine month period ended January 1, 2011. We expect to
make capital expenditures of approximately $10.0 to $12.0 million during
fiscal 2011 in connection with our existing business. We intend to fund our
fiscal 2011 capital expenditures principally through existing cash, internally
generated funds and borrowings under our JP Morgan Credit Agreement. We may also
make substantial additional capital expenditures in connection with
acquisitions.
Obligations
and Commitments
As of
January 1, 2011, there were no material changes in capital lease, operating
lease or pension and postretirement obligations as compared to such obligations
and liabilities as of April 3, 2010. In the nine months ended January
1, 2011, we repaid $37.0 million of our prior outstanding credit facility and
borrowed $30.0 million on our new JP Morgan credit
facility.
Other
Matters
Critical
Accounting Estimates
Preparation of our financial statements
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses. We believe the most
complex and sensitive judgments, because of their significance to the
Consolidated Financial Statements, result primarily from the need to make
estimates about the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our fiscal
2010 Annual Report, incorporated by reference in our fiscal 2010 Form 10-K,
describe the significant accounting estimates and policies used in preparation
of the Consolidated Financial Statements. Actual results in these areas could
differ from management’s estimates. There have been no significant changes in
our critical accounting estimates during the first nine months of fiscal
2011.
ITEM
3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
We are
exposed to market risks, which arise during the normal course of business from
changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates.
Interest Rates. We
are exposed to market risk from changes in the interest rates on a portion of
our outstanding indebtedness. Outstanding balances under our JP Morgan Credit
Agreement generally bear interest at the prime rate or LIBOR (the London
inter-bank offered rate for deposits in U.S. dollars for the applicable LIBOR
period) plus a specified margin, depending on the type of borrowing being made.
The applicable margin is based on our consolidated ratio of net debt to adjusted
EBITDA from time to time. As of January 1, 2011, our margin is 0.5% for prime
rate loans (prime rate at January 1, 2011 was 3.25%) and 1.5% for LIBOR rate
loans (one month LIBOR rate at January 1, 2011 was 0.3125%).
Our interest rate risk management
objective is to limit the impact of interest rate changes on our net income and
cash flow. To achieve our objective, we regularly evaluate the amount of our
variable rate debt as a percentage of our aggregate debt. As of January 1, 2011,
our average outstanding variable rate debt, after taking into account the $30.0
million notional amount of our interest rate swap agreement, was 0% of our
average outstanding debt. We manage a significant portion of our exposure to
interest rate fluctuations in our variable rate debt through an interest rate
swap agreement. This agreement effectively converts interest rate exposure from
variable rates to fixed rates of interest.
Foreign Currency Exchange
Rates. Our exposure to risk associated with fluctuating currency exchange
rates between the U.S. dollar, the Euro, the Swiss Franc and the British Pound
Sterling has increased. Our Swiss operations utilize the Swiss Franc as the
functional currency, our French operations utilize the Euro as the functional
currency and our English operations utilize the British Pound Sterling as the
functional currency. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are included
in earnings. Approximately 13% of our net sales were denominated in foreign
currencies in the first nine months of fiscal 2011 compared to 15% in the same
period last fiscal year. We expect that this proportion is likely to increase as
we seek to increase our penetration of foreign markets, particularly within the
aerospace and defense markets. Foreign currency transaction exposure arises
primarily from the transfer of foreign currency from one subsidiary to another
within the group, and to foreign currency denominated cash deposits and trade
receivables. The impact of such transactions and assets is recorded in
non-operating expense on the income statement. Unrealized currency translation
gains and losses are recognized upon translation of the foreign subsidiaries’
balance sheets to U.S. dollars. Because our financial statements are denominated
in U.S. dollars, changes in currency exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and
other currencies have had, and will continue to have, an impact on our earnings.
As of January 1, 2011, we do not have exchange rate hedges in place to reduce
the risk of an adverse currency exchange movement. Currency fluctuations may
materially affect our financial performance in the future. The impact of future
exchange rate fluctuations on our results of operations cannot be accurately
predicted.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We have
no off-balance sheet arrangements.
ITEM
4. Controls and Procedures
Our
management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) as of January 1, 2011. Based on this
evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have
concluded that, as of January 1, 2011, our disclosure controls and procedures
were (1) designed to ensure that information relating to our Company required to
be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act
is recorded, processed, summarized and reported to our Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer within the time periods specified in the rules and
forms of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, and (2) effective, in that
they provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Changes
in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
No change
in our internal control over financial reporting occurred during the nine month
period ended January 1, 2011 that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange
Act).
PART
II - OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM
1. Legal Proceedings
From time
to time, we are involved in litigation and administrative proceedings which
arise in the ordinary course of our business. We do not believe that any
litigation or proceeding in which we are currently involved, either individually
or in the aggregate, is likely to have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition, operating results, cash flow or
prospects.
ITEM
1A. Risk Factors
There
have been no material changes to our risk factors and uncertainties during the
nine month period ended January 1, 2011. For a discussion of the Risk Factors,
refer to Part I, Item 2, “Cautionary Statement As To Forward-Looking
Information,” contained in this report and Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,”
contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended April
3, 2010.
ITEM
2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities
None.
Use of Proceeds
Not
applicable.
Issuer Purchases of Equity
Securities
On June 15, 2007, our board of
directors authorized us to repurchase up to $10.0 million of our common stock
from time to time on the open market, through block trades, or in privately
negotiated transactions depending on market conditions, alternative uses of
capital and other factors. Purchases may be commenced, suspended or
discontinued at any time without prior notice. The new program, which does not
have an expiration date, replaced a $7.5 million program that expired on March
31, 2007.
Total share repurchases for the three
months ended January 1, 2011 are as follows:
|
|
Total
number
of shares
Purchased
|
|
|
Average
price paid
per share
|
|
|
Number of
shares
purchased
as part of the
publicly
announced
program
|
|
|
Approximate
dollar value
of shares still
available to be
purchased
under the
program
(000’s)
|
|
10/03/2010–10/30/2010
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
5,906 |
|
10/31/2010–11/27/2010
|
|
|
9,077 |
|
|
|
34.95 |
|
|
|
9,077 |
|
|
|
5,589 |
|
11/28/2010–01/01/2011
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
5,589 |
|
Total
|
|
|
9,077 |
|
|
$ |
34.95 |
|
|
|
9,077
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM
6. Exhibits
Exhibit
Number
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
31.01
|
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act
Rule 13a-14(a).
|
31.02
|
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act
Rule 13a-14(a).
|
32.01
|
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and
Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b).*
|
32.02
|
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and
Securities Exchange Act
Rule 13a-14(b).*
|
*
This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, is not
deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any
filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the
date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
|
RBC
Bearings Incorporated
|
|
|
|
(Registrant)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
Michael
J. Hartnett
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Chief
Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
Date:
|
February
10, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
Daniel
A. Bergeron
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
Date:
|
February
10, 2011
|
|
EXHIBIT
INDEX
Exhibit
Number
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
31.01
|
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act
Rule 13a-14(a).
|
31.02
|
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act
Rule 13a-14(a).
|
32.01
|
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and
Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b).*
|
32.02
|
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and
Securities Exchange Act
Rule 13a-14(b).*
|
*
This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, is not
deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any
filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the
date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.
Exhibit 31.01
CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT
TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I,
Michael J. Hartnett, certify that:
1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of RBC Bearings
Incorporated;
2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial
reporting (as
defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and
have:
a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including any consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b)
designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles; and
c)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
d)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
and
5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.
Date:
February 10, 2011
|
By:
|
/s/
Michael J. Hartnett
|
|
|
|
Michael
J. Hartnett
|
|
|
President
and Chief Executive
Officer
|
Exhibit 31.02
CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT
TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Daniel
A. Bergeron, certify that:
1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of RBC Bearings
Incorporated;
2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial
reporting (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and
have:
a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including any consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b)
designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles; and
c)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
d)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
and
5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.
Date:
February 10, 2011
|
By:
|
/s/
Daniel A. Bergeron
|
|
|
|
Daniel
A. Bergeron
|
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
Exhibit 32.01
CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT
TO
18 U.S.C
SECTION 1350
The
undersigned, Michael J. Hartnett, the President and Chief Executive Officer of
RBC Bearings Incorporated (the “Company”), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, hereby
certifies that:
(i) the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 1, 2011 of the
Company (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
(ii) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Dated:
February 10, 2011
|
/s/
Michael J. Hartnett
|
|
|
Michael
J. Hartnett
|
|
President
and Chief Executive
Officer
|
Exhibit 32.02
CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT
TO
18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350
The
undersigned, Daniel A. Bergeron, Chief Financial Officer, of RBC Bearings
Incorporated (the “Company”), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, hereby
certifies:
(i) the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 1, 2011 of the
Company (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
(ii) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Dated:
February 10, 2011
|
/s/
Daniel A. Bergeron
|
|
|
Daniel
A. Bergeron
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|